Priodas gyfunryw: Gwahaniaeth rhwng fersiynau
Cynnwys wedi'i ddileu Cynnwys wedi'i ychwanegu
Llinell 21:
==Crynodeb==
[[Delwedd:
{{legend|#002255|Priodi ar gael i gyplau cyfunryw}}
{{legend|#00ffde|Wedi'u cydnabod neu eu perfformio mewn amgylchiadau cyfyngedig}}
Llinell 31:
Mae cyflwyno priodas un rhyw wedi amrywio yn ôl awdurdodaeth, yn deillio o newidiadau deddfwriaethol i ddeddfau priodas, heriau llys sy'n seiliedig ar warantau cyfansoddiadol o gydraddoldeb, neu gyfreithloni gan bleidleiswyr drwy refferenda a mentrau pleidleisio. Mae cydnabyddiaeth o briodasau cyfunryw yn fater hawliau sifil, cydraddoldeb, hawliau dynol, gwleidyddol, cymdeithasol, moesol, a chrefyddol mewn llawer o wledydd. Mae dadleuon wedi bod yn codi ynghylch y cwestiwn a ddylai cyplau o'r un rhyw gael eu caniatáu i briodi, angen defnyddio statws gwahanol (fel undeb sifil, sydd naill ai'n rhoi'r un hawliau cyfartal â phriodas neu hawliau cyfyngedig o gymharu â phriodas), neu ddim yn cael unrhyw hawliau o'r fath.<ref name=MuslimWaPo>{{cite news|last=Taylor|first=Pamela K.|title=Marriage: Both Civil and Religious|url=http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/pamela_k_taylor/2009/07/marriage_both_civil_and_religious.html|accessdate=20 September 2012|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=31 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Smith|first=Susan K.|title=Marriage a Civil Right, not Sacred Rite|url=http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/susan_k_smith/2009/07/marriage_a_civil_right_not_sacred_rite.html|accessdate=20 September 2012|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=30 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger| url=https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/files/09cv2292-ORDER.pdf|accessdate=6 August 2010}}</ref> Gall priodas cyfunryw ddarparu trethdalwyr LHDT gyda gwasanaethau'r llywodraeth a gwneud gofynion ariannol arnynt sy'n debyg i'r rhai a roddir i ac sy'n ofynnol o gyplau priod gwryw-benyw. Mae priodas cyfunryw hefyd yn rhoi amddiffyniadau cyfreithiol fel hawliau etifeddiaeth ac ymweliadau ysbyty.<ref>Handbook of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Administration and Policy — Page 13, Wallace Swan - 2004</ref>
Mae rhai o dadansoddwyr yn datgan bod lles ariannol, seicolegol a chorfforol yn gwella trwy briodas, a bod plant o gyplau cyfunryw yn elwa o gael eu codi gan ddau riant mewn undeb a gydnabyddir yn gyfreithiol a gefnogir gan sefydliadau'r gymdeithas<ref name="psychological">{{cite web|url= http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council/policy/gay-marriage.pdf|title=Resolution on Sexual Orientation and Marriage|year=2004|author=American Psychological Association|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="psychiatric">{{cite web|author=American Psychiatric Association|year=2005|title=Support of Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Civil Marriage|url=http://archive.psych.org/edu/other_res/lib_archives/archives/200502.pdf|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="psychoanalytic">{{cite web|url= http://www.apsa.org/About_APsaA/Position_Statements/Gay_Marriage.aspx|author=American Psychoanalytic Association|title=Position Paper On Gay Marriage|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="asa">{{cite web|url=http://www2.asanet.org/public/marriage_res.html|author=American Sociological Association|title=American Sociological Association Member Resolution on Proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendment Regarding Marriage|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref><ref name="amici">{{cite web|url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|title=Brief of the American Psychological Association, The California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy as amici curiae in support of plaintiff-appellees – Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker)|accessdate=5 November 2010}}</ref><ref name=cpa2006>{{cite web|title=Marriage of Same-Sex Couples – 2006 Position Statement|url=http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Practice_Page/Marriage_SameSex_Couples_PositionStatement.pdf|publisher=[[Canadian Psychological Association]]|accessdate=28 September 2012}}</ref><ref name=pediatrics>{{Cite journal|author=Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM, ''et al.''|title=The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children|journal=Pediatrics|volume=118|issue=1|pages=349–64|year=2006|month=July|pmid=16818585|doi=10.1542/peds.2006-1279}} available online: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349</ref>.
| |||